Insurance is mutual risk sharing. It is a concept whereby individuals and/or businesses band together to reduce an uncertain possible catestropic loss.
The uncertainty can be the time such as in life insurance or in an event such as in fire insurance.
This desire to provide for future security has expanded to areas from retirement to health and has produced confusion and polarized debate. It has also produced an issue of entitlement or inividual responsibiity.
Is financial security for retirement an insurable risk? It is catostropic for the individual that could no longer work to support his or her self and it is catostropic for a country (government) that was unable to care for these individuals.
In the wake of WWI, the government decided that the loss of life for elderly individuals who could no longer support themselves for BASIC needs was a catestropic loss for the whole country and passed the Social Security Act where ALL individuals were required to purchase BASIC retirement insurance that all would collect at age 65. Because everyone shared this cost which did not include the cost of Private Enterprise profit, it was affordable for everyone. It was found that there were a number of catestropic events such as handicaps, accidents and health impairments for those unable to handle the financial burden that these hazards demanded, were catestropic losses for the whole country and were added to the Social Security enactment.
The current polarized "debate" concerns HEALTH and appears to go beyond the basic and catestropic concepts. In the case of health, would the individual be responsible for their own basic health care? Children, of course, are the wards of the STATE and therefore would the State be resposible for their basic health care? On the other hand, should an able bodied adult be responsible for their own basic health care? Could catostropic health care for an able adult be a government resonsiblilty? and what is an able adult? What is the government responsibility for disabled adults?
Private enterprise has found that accident insurance and other health care benefits could be offered at an acceptable price that would afford a profit.
But great advances in health care have expanded the costs in this area to the point where AFFORDABILITY must be a consideration in the debate.
The immature approach of just slashing costs will only aceserbate the problem,. Waste and corruption must be curbed, but to cut survival costs
would cause hardship and impede recovery. Education, Infrastructure. Roads and Bridges, Law Enforcement, Emergency Rescue, Civil Service Agencies, and the like are absolutely essenial to surival, recovery and successful business enterprise to produce jobs that would accelrate the recovery. To cut basic suival costs and expect business to suceed and produce jobs to aid the recovery is a no brainer in the true sense of the word. Insurance is a valuable management tool but it has its limitations. It is not an entitlement. It requires both individual and government responsibility.
Wednesday, August 22, 2012
Subscribe to:
Post Comments (Atom)
No comments:
Post a Comment